Chapter Six Repercussions...
Martin L. Kaiser, Inc.
29 November 1999
Immigration Board
Reference: 007956
Attention: Liz Walton
Dear Ms. Walton:
This letter is in response to yours of 10 September, 1999 to Mr. John Bostock of John D.Bostock Associates.
For the past 27 years I have been a good citizen on the Cayman Islands and given generous financial and personal support to many, many charitable and civic organizations. On numerous I have assisted Royal Cayman Police Force in areas of my expertise. I sincerely regret the current state of affairs.
I place the blame for the destruction of my Cayman dream directly on the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation in particular and the U.S. intelligence community in general. Allow me to explain.
Years ago your residency application asked "Have you ever been charged with a crime?" I would then have to say "Yes, I lawfully electronically bugged a couple of corrupt FBI agents." To express their displeasure they used the enormous power of the U.S. government to fabricate a crime, lie to a Grand Jury and falsely accuse me of committing that crime. They tampered with evidence they themselves had created and perjured themselves before the court. After I was acquitted they sued me for US$22,OOO,OOO claiming I caused them mental anguish. One agent claimed I aggravated the sty in his eye and the other that I aggravated his hemorrhoids. That suit lasted for nearly ten years and cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars before it was dismissed. You may go to my web site and read more about this story. You may not agree with my methods but I tell you that the price of freedom is not "free."
Recently that same question on your residency application was changed to "Have you ever been convicted of a crime?" I immediately reapplied to immigration and answered "NO." Now, it appears, my actions were too late.
You have a beautiful Island...don't loose it. It is truly a pity that I shall not be part of it.
Respectfully,
MANUFACTURER OF SURVEILLANCE. COUNTER SURVEILLANCE. BOMB DETECTION EQUIPMENT
The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski Subject: A matter of fairness Dear Senator Mikulski: Recently, Sandia National Laboratories received a grant to develop a disrupter. A disrupter is a tool used by bomb technicians to disarm improvised explosive devices (IEDs) such as letter/mail, pipe or car bombs. Over the past 25 years I have sold hundreds of my disrupter to federal, state and local bomb squads. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) then received a grant to purchase 400 disrupters of Sandia's design. What happened next is, to me, absolutely inconceivable. The FBI gave these disrupters away free of charge to virtually every bomb squad in the United states. My market went to zero overnight. Since my disrupter sells for roughly $4,000.00, the FBI's action meant an instantaneous loss of $1,600,000.00! Martin L. Kaiser, Inc. consists of myself and a part-time assistant. I'm sure you can appreciate that a loss of this magnitude is totally devastating to a company the size of mine. There is absolutely no way I can compete with the FBI. When I telephoned your office and spoke with a member of your staff he told me to make sure I tell you exactly what help I wanted. Obviously, I would like you to help me recover from this loss. One solution would be to give the grant money directly to the bomb squads and allow them the option of choosing whatever disrupter is best for their needs. I would appreciate hearing any ideas you may have to resolve this dilemma. Your kind assistance and guidance will determine the future of my company. Supporting documentation is available for your review. Please do not hesitate contacting me with any questions or comments. Until then, I remain,
TEL: (410) 252-8810 . FAX: (410) 666-8790 Washington, D.C. 20510-2003
Mr. Martin L. Kaiser
Thank you for contacting me about the impact of the recent grant received by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on your business. In response to your concern, I have requested that Mr. Louis J. Freeh, Federal Bureau of Investigation take a look at this issue. I have asked Mr. Freeh to respond to you directly. Thank you again for bringing this to my attention.
The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski
Subject: A matter of fairness
Dear Senator Mikulski:
With reference to your response to my letter of 28 February...WHY
THE HECK DID YOU DO THAT!? My God, Senator, it doesn't take
a rocket scientist to figure out that Mr. Freeh is a COMPETITOR and he is using the enormous power of the United States Government to enforce that position. If any of his employees show up at my door to "investigate" this matter they are going to find themselves on the street sitting on their butts. I trust you would agree that this is the proper response.
Mr. Freeh obviously has no concept, whatsoever, of how the free enterprise system works and therefore cannot self-judge the damage he has caused. This matter should be placed in the hands of Attorney General Janet Reno. Would you be so kind as to assist in doing that?
Please do not hesitate contacting me with any questions or comments. Until then, I remain,
cc: sp
TEL: (410) 252-8810 . FAX: (410) 666-8790
MANUFACTURER OF SURVEILLANCE · COUNTER SURVEILLANCE · BOMB DETECTION EQUIPMENT
8 January 2001
The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski
Subject: A matter of fairness
Dear Senator Mikulski:
Thank you for your continued assistance in resolving my problems with the FBI.
Once again, the FBI has unilaterally absolved itself of any wrongdoing. It is inconceivable they did this without ever interviewing the very person making serious accusations and holding the damning evidence.
I look forward to your response to my letter of 27 November 2000.
TEL: (410) 252-8810 · FAX: (410) 666-8790
In the late 1990's I was approached by Touchstone Pictures, a division of Walt Disney Productions, to help with a new film to be entitled "Enemy of the State." My buddy Steve Uhrig and I were to be technical advisors. We received the screenplay from Touchstone/David Marconi and immediately got to work correcting and writing the technical language. We started with a script one inch thick and eventually wound up with a script five inches thick. I ask Jerry Bruckheimer why he decided to kill off NSA agents instead of FBI agents he responded that the general public already accepted the FBI to be corrupt and dishonest and beating a dead horse would accomplish little. Naturally, I couldn't disagee with him. I didn't make a lot of money on the project but walked away with the title of "Film Maker."
Chapter One The Beginning...
© 2005-2008 05/08 |